For your post I want you to consider the following questions:
Assuming that harvesting your own food, (whether it’s shooting a deer, catching a fish, or growing carrots) gives you a stronger connection to the source of your food (as opposed to buying a package of meat and not thinking about where it comes from) – is this a good thing? Is it advantageous to have a stronger connection to where your food comes from? Or put another way, would you be more or less likely to eat meat if you had to kill and butcher the animals you ate?
Is hunting moral? Is it morally justifiable to kill a wild animal for food when there is so much food already killed and for sale? The situation is obviously different if the hunter is living below the poverty line, but I’m talking about typical middle and upper class hunters.
What was your reaction to Steve Rinella’s plan to kill a fairly substantial number of different animals for the sake of putting on a mammoth feed in honor of Escoffier’s Guide Culinaire?
What is your feeling about
Feel free to consider other questions as well.
Your post should be a minimum of 200 words.
In addition to your post, please include, at the end, a recommendation for two books that
Include the citation for the books. Please use MLA Citation Style for your entries.
0 comments:
Post a Comment